U.S. v. E-6. Staff Sergeant is accused of a number of allegations made by a feminine Specialist. Wisconsin National Guard unit prefers fees against Sergeant First Class based on the allegations of seven feminine cadets and recruits who allege sexual harassment and other critical misconduct. U.S. v. O-3. Captain in the Army is false accused of sexual assault of a female Lieutenant when they had been both stationed in Germany and earlier than returning to the States. Among feminine students, the prevalence was greater amongst lesbian and bisexual (32.2%) than heterosexual (20.5%) and undecided (25.2%) college students. Client, a Captain (O-3) is represented by Mr. Gapasin to signify him at an officer separation board. After a full day of taking testimony, and on the conclusion of all the evidence, the Board of Officers fully retains Gapasin’s client. Following argument at the Article 39(a) motions hearing on the primary day of the trial, Military Judge grants Gapasin’s Motion to Dismiss.

Paul and Jamie host a very complicated Thanksgiving Day. She then moved to New Jersey, where she attended Rutgers University. The preliminary version of the questionnaire was designed by the Sialon II community in step with the global AIDS Monitoring indicators (GAM)16,20 and previous EC-funded European tasks (e.g.21,22) and then piloted amongst MSM in every examine site. This Soldier accuses him of kicking him during corrective coaching, communicating a threat and pointing both loaded and unloaded weapons at him at multiple instances. U.S. v. E-4. Highly-Decorated Corporal is charged with multiple specs of maltreatment and assault of one of many Soldiers in his squad. Charges are most popular and Gapasin information a Motion to Dismiss all prices and specifications arguing that the fees are unsupported by the evidence. Wade’s again from Colorado and tells Grace that he and Nadine are splitting up. He additionally cross-examines the USACIL lab forensic professional and reveals DNA results which can be inconsistent with the accuser’s claim that she was compelled to perform oral intercourse in the shower while too intoxicated to consent. The Staff Sergeant’s DNA was obtained from underpants of the Specialist. Client was also accused of sexually harassing a Specialist whereas on TDY. U.S. v. O-4. Major (O-4) is accused of wrongfully and knowingly ingesting THC, or marijuana, after testing positive in a urinalysis.

Major asserts this was not done knowingly. Mr. Gapasin reveals how members in the squad couldn’t handle the corrective coaching and excessive expectations of this Corporal. The Officer Panel virtually acquits the Corporal and solely finds that his corrective coaching went too far on one occasion. Other witnesses testified towards the Corporal claiming that he did maltreat and assault the Soldier. Gapasin cross-examined a number of witnesses and introduced quite a lot of documents to include Agent Investigators’ Reports as well as sworn statements by witnesses who had been present during each incidents. At trial before an Officer Panel, Mr. Gapasin aggressively cross-examines the accuser as well as the opposite witnesses and exposes a number of inconsistencies and a lack of corroboration. Mr. Gapasin cross-examines the accuser and reveals a number of inconsistencies in her allegations. Gapasin revealed how each accusers used false intercourse assault allegations to keep away from some form of administrative punishment. During Mr. Gapasin’s aggressive cross-examinations, three (3) of the accusers refused to testify except they have been granted immunity.

Mr. Gapasin carried out extensive discovery throughout the Article 32 and after it thereby revealing an absence of credibility of several of the client’s accusers. U.S. v. E-7. Mr. Gapasin is retained in Wisconsin’s first-ever courtroom-martial. U.S. v. E-2. Young Marine is accused of disobeying a lawful order, disobeying a superior commissioned officer and obstruction of justice following a skirmish off the highway with an Army Provost Marshal. Client is accused by the government of getting sexually assault a younger lieutenant at a house after a gaggle of officers had gone out drinking. By utilizing the models of Jesus, Buddha, Rama or Krishna we have now destroyed the possibility of nature throwing out distinctive individuals. In keeping with the Lieutenant, a group of officers hung out after a night time of drinking and slept in the house of another officer following a social gathering. Following Gapasin’s motions, consumer opts to request discharge in lieu of a court docket-martial. Three-Star General presides over listening to and finds insufficient proof to find Gapasin’s shopper responsible of wrongfully and knowingly ingesting THC. The Article 32, which did not proceed below the lately handed NDAA 2015, befell over the course of two days.